Programmable logic device with time-multiplexed interconnect

ABSTRACT

A PLD includes at least one portion of the programmable interconnect that can be time multiplexed. The time multiplexed interconnect allows signals to be routed on shared interconnect at different times to different destinations, thereby increasing the functionality of the PLD. Multiple sources can use the same interconnect at different times to send signals to their respective destinations. To ensure proper sharing of the interconnect, the sources can include selection devices (such as multiplexers), and the destinations can include capture devices (such as flip-flops), wherein the selection devices and the capture devices are controlled by the same time multiplexing signal. To optimize the time multiplexing interconnect, as much of the same interconnect is shared as possible.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to programmable logic devices, and inparticular to a system and method for time multiplexing the programmableinterconnect of a field programmable gate array.

2. Description of the Related Art

Programmable logic devices such as field programmable gate arrays(“FPGAs”) are a well-known type of integrated circuit and are of wideapplicability due to the flexibility provided by their reprogrammablenature. An FPGA typically includes an array of configurable logic blocks(CLBs) that are programmably interconnected to each other to providelogic functions desired by a user (a circuit designer). An FPGAtypically includes a regular array of identical CLBs, wherein each CLBis individually programmed to perform any one of a number of differentlogic functions. These functions may include logic in lookup tables(LUTs) and storage in flip-flops or latches. The FPGA may also includetri-state buffers that users may use to share routing wires. The FPGAhas a configurable routing structure called a programmable interconnect(hereinafter interconnect) for interconnecting the CLBs according to thedesired user circuit design. The FPGA also includes a number ofconfiguration memory cells which are operatively coupled to the CLBs tospecify the function to be performed by each CLB, as well as to theinterconnect to specify the coupling of the input and output lines ofeach CLB.

One approach available in the prior art to increase the functionality oflogic circuits has been increasing the number of CLBs and interconnectstructures in the FPGA. However, for any given semiconductor fabricationtechnology, there are limitations to the number of CLBs that can befabricated on an integrated circuit chip of practical size. Thus, therecontinues to be a need to increase the number of logic gates or CLBdensities for FPGAs.

Because the chip area of programmable logic devices is dominated byinterconnect area, methods have been proposed for sharing thisinterconnect. In one approach, a user uses tri-state buffers ormultiplexers to place different signals into a wire at different times.The user can build circuitry in the programmable logic to control thetri-state buffers or multiplexers, and to capture the desired signals attheir destination. Unfortunately, this method requires a significantamount of programmable logic and interconnect resources which may begreater than the amount saved by sharing the interconnect.

Another approach to increase the functionality of logic circuits hasbeen the reconfiguration of the FPGA. Unfortunately, thisreconfiguration requires the time consuming step of reloading aconfiguration bit stream for each reconfiguration. Moreover,reconfiguration of an FPGA generally requires suspending theimplementation of the logic functions, saving the current state of thelogic functions in a memory device external to the FPGA, reloading theentire array of memory configurations cells, and inputting the states ofthe logic functions, which have been saved off chip along with any otherneeded inputs. Each of these steps requires a significant amount oftime, thereby rendering reconfiguration impractical for implementingtypical circuits.

Yet other approaches to increase the complexity and size of logiccircuits have been to time multiplex the FPGA using additionalconfiguration memory cells. Specifically, one configuration memory celltypically controls each programming point on an FPGA. FIG. 1 illustratesan exemplary configuration memory cell 100, which includes aconventional latch 101 operatively coupled to a select transistor 102.Configuration memory cell 100 can be loaded with configuration data 105via select transistor 102, which is controlled by a configuration selectsignal 104. Once loaded into latch 101, configuration data 105 can beprovided to CLB and interconnect logic 103.

In one exemplary time multiplexing approach described in U.S. Pat. No.5,426,378, at least first and second arrays of configuration memorycells can be provided. For example, FIG. 2 illustrates a switchingdevice (e.g. a multiplexer) 206 receiving inputs from a firstconfiguration array 201 and a second configuration array 202. In oneembodiment, a user's clock 204 can be divided into two phases. During afirst phase, the configuration data in first configuration array 201 canbe used, thereby configuring a CLB and interconnect matrix 205 in afirst configuration. During a second phase, the configuration data insecond configuration array 202 can be used, thereby configuring CLB andinterconnect matrix 205 in a second configuration. In this embodiment, athird configuration array 203 can be provided, wherein the configurationdata stored in this array does not change during reconfiguration. Inthis manner, where each CLB could previously implement one logicfunction during a cycle of the user's clock, each CLB can now implementtwo logic functions during the same cycle.

In another exemplary time multiplexing approach described in U.S. Pat.No. 5,583,450, each memory cell can be replaced with a random accessmemory (RAM) bit set. For example, FIG. 3 illustrates a bit set 300 thatincludes eight memory cells MC1-MC8. Each memory cell MC has a latch 301and an associated select transistor 302. Memory cells MC1-MC8 arecoupled to receive configuration data 303 and provide signals to aclocked latch 304.

In one embodiment, the configuration bits at the same memory celllocation in each bit set on the FPGA are read out simultaneously toupdate the configuration of the CLBs and interconnect, thereby causingthe CLBs to perform different logical functions and the interconnect tomake different connections. In other words, by providing a bit set witheight memory cells for each FPGA programming point, an FPGA caneffectively provide eight configurations. By reconfiguring the CLBs, thenumber of function generators in the CLB, typically conventional look uptables (“real LUTs”), needed to implement a given number of LUTs in auser circuit (“virtual LUTs”) are reduced by a factor of the number ofconfigurations.

In either time multiplexing approach, the additional configurationmemory cells increase logic density by dynamic re-use of the FPGAcircuitry. Specifically, CLBs and interconnect are configured to performsome defined task at one instant and are reconfigured to perform anothertask at another instant. However, these additional configuration memorycells can cause significant complexity in their programming as well asin their operation. Moreover, these additional configuration memorycells can also undesirably take up significant silicon area. Forexample, a typical CLB could include between 360 and 564 programmingpoints, wherein each programming point would be implemented by a bit set(e.g. bit set 300). Thus, instead of being configured by 360 to 564memory cells in a non-time multiplexed FPGA, each CLB could beconfigured by as many as 4512 memory cells. (Note that this count caninclude many memory cells that are actually located in the interconnect,but are associated with a CLB.) Therefore, although offering significantadvantages in logic density, a time multiplexed FPGA can have anunacceptable cost in silicon area.

Therefore, a need arises for a system and method of increasingfunctionality of an FPGA while minimizing silicon resources.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Programmable interconnect can encompass a majority of the area on aprogrammable logic device. However, particularly in a dense logicdesign, the use of the programmable interconnect can be heavily taxed.Therefore, sharing of this interconnect without significant degradationin performance is highly desirable.

In accordance with one feature of the invention, a programmable logicdevice includes at least one portion of the programmable interconnectthat can be time multiplexed. Of importance, the configuration of thattime multiplexed programmable interconnect is static. In other words, noadditional configuration memory is needed to implement the timemultiplexed interconnect. As noted above, duplication of configurationmemory is highly undesirable due to size and programming considerations.The time multiplexed interconnect allows signals to be routed on sharedinterconnect at different times to different destinations, therebyincreasing the functionality of the programmable logic device.

The configured programmable logic device can include a plurality ofconfigurable logic blocks. A first set of configurable logic blocksincludes multiple signal sources coupled to a selection device. A secondset of configurable logic blocks includes multiple capture devices andcorresponding signal destinations. The configured programmable logicdevice further includes a programmable interconnect coupled to theplurality of configurable logic blocks according to a design. At leastone portion of the programmable interconnect couples the selectiondevice and the multiple capture devices. The configured programmablelogic device further includes a time multiplexing signal generatoroperatively coupled to the selection device and the capture devices. Thetime multiplexing signal generator controls which of the multiple signalsources provides its signal to a corresponding signal destination.

In one embodiment, to provide this configured programmable logic device,a netlist can be analyzed for signals having certain characteristics.For example, the characteristics can include the physical signal sourceslocated in substantially the same area in the programmable logic device.A set of nets carrying such signals can be merged into a sharedinterconnect portion. The netlist can then be altered based on the newshared interconnect portion. At this point, the design represented bythe altered netlist can be placed and routed. Then, phases of a timemultiplexed clock can be selected for the signal sources andcorresponding destinations.

In another embodiment, to provide this configured programmable logicdevice, an initial placement of a design to be implemented by theprogrammable logic device can be performed. The nets that exhibitlocality based on the initial placement can be identified. The nets canbe merged into a shared interconnect portion. The design can be alteredaccordingly. At this point, the design can be placed and routed. Then,phases of a time multiplexed clock can be selected for the signalsources and corresponding destinations.

In either embodiment, the shared interconnect portion can be driven by afirst signal (generated by a first signal source) on a first phase and asecond signal (generated by a second signal source) on a second phase.At the destinations, the capture devices can include latches controlledby the time multiplexing signal generator to selectively capture thefirst and second signals on different phases, i.e. either phase 1 orphase 2. In other words, a first destination can capture the firstsignal on the first phase and a second destination can capture thesecond signal on the second phase. Other embodiments of the inventioncan include any number of signal sources and signal destinations.

To optimize the time multiplexing interconnect, as much of the sameprogrammable interconnect is shared as possible. Additional programmableinterconnect is used as necessary to connect the shared portion of theprogrammable interconnect to the signal destinations.

Advantageously, the selection and capture devices take up few siliconresources on the programmable logic device while facilitating the timemultiplexing of the interconnect.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary configuration memory cell, whichincludes a conventional latch operatively coupled to a selecttransistor.

FIG. 2 illustrates a time multiplexing approach for switching betweentwo configurations. During a first phase of user's clock, theconfiguration data in a first configuration array can be used, therebyconfiguring a CLB and interconnect matrix in a first configuration.During a second phase of the user's clock, the configuration data in asecond configuration array can be used, thereby configuring the CLB andinterconnect matrix in a second configuration.

FIG. 3 illustrates another time multiplexing approach for switchingbetween multiple (e.g. eight) configurations.

FIG. 4A illustrates one embodiment of the invention in which sources ina CLB can share sections of the interconnect to provide signals tomultiple CLBs.

FIG. 4B illustrates another embodiment of the invention in which atleast one source in a CLB and at least one source outside the CLB canshare sections of the interconnect to provide signals to multiple CLBs.

FIG. 4C illustrates yet another embodiment of the invention in whichmultiple sources, in the same CLB or different CLBs, can share sectionsof the interconnect to provide signals to the same CLB.

FIG. 5A illustrates one flow chart for time multiplexing theinterconnect.

FIG. 5B illustrates another flow chart for time multiplexing theinterconnect.

FIG. 6 illustrates a portion of a CLB including two selection devicesfor implementing time multiplexed interconnect.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

In accordance with one feature of the invention, the interconnect of theFPGA can be time multiplexed without additional configuration memorycells for interconnect resources. Specifically, designated sources ofsignals can use common sections of the interconnect at different timesto send their signals to their respective destinations. This sharing ofthe interconnect can advantageously reduce the need for interconnect (orat least additional interconnect), thereby conserving one of the mostexpensive resources on the FPGA.

FIG. 4A illustrates one embodiment of the invention in which sources ina CLB can share portions of the interconnect to provide signals tomultiple CLBs. In this embodiment, the sources 403A and 403B compriselook-up tables (LUTs), which typically implement the function generatorsin an FPGA. A selection device 404, e.g. a multiplexer or anotherswitching component, can receive signals from sources 403A and 403B andselectively drive one of those signals onto interconnect 405, which caninclude multiple programmable interconnect points 413A-413C.

In this embodiment, the shared portion of interconnect 405 includes thesegment from selection device 404 to programmable interconnect point413B. Non-shared portions of interconnect 405 include segments fromprogrammable interconnect point 413B to programmable interconnect points413A and 413C as well as segments from interconnect points 413A and 413Cto respective destinations 406 and 409. Note that the segments shown inFIG. 4A are illustrative only and are not intended to infer eitherlength or programmable interconnect point restrictions. In other words,in an actual implementation, the number of segments, both shared andnon-shared, can be more or less than that shown in FIG. 4A. Moreover,the number of programmable interconnect points in an actual embodimentcan be more or less than those shown in FIG. 4A.

The interconnect is generally considered the most expensive resource ofan FPGA. Therefore, advantages associated with time multiplexing of theinterconnect can be directly related to the amount of sharedinterconnect. For example, an ability to share any interconnect canadvantageously improve routing congestion in a densely packed logicdesign. Further, the FPGA base can be made more cheaply because lesstotal interconnect is required to successfully route the design. Thus,in accordance with one feature of the invention, the shared portion ofthe interconnect can be maximized, thereby ensuring the most advantagesfrom time multiplexing of the interconnect.

Each destination can include a capture device for determining when asignal is latched and used by the destination. For example, destinations406 and 409 can include flip-flops 407 and 410, respectively, which canbe controlled by a time multiplexing (TM) signal 401. TM signalgenerator 400, which generates TM signal 401, can be simple or complex,but must indicate the phase or the transitions between phases. In thismanner, sources and destinations can synchronize when a value is beingplaced on the shared interconnect and when it is used. A simple TMsignal generator could include a single A/B switch signal (where A and Bare two different signal time slices) for 2:1 multiplexing. Another TMsignal generator could include a multi-bit phase bus. In anotherembodiment, the TM signal generator could include a simple clock signalwith a global reset signal indicating a first phase to synchronize allsources. Note that in this embodiment, the sources and destinationswould need to separately determine the current time-multiplexed phase byusing a counter or some other means.

The use of TM signal 401 will now be described in further detail.Specifically, during a first phase in which TM signal 401 is a firstlogic state, TM signal 401 can select an output signal from source 403A(via selection device 404) to be latched by flip-flop 407. During asecond phase in which TM signal 401 is a second logic state, TM signal401 can select an output signal from source 403B (also via selectiondevice 404) to be latched by flip-flop 410.

Note that the diamond on the clock input to the flip-flop indicates anoptional inversion controlled by a configuration memory cell. Forexample, flip-flop 407 could use a non-inverted clock (as shown by theopen diamond), whereas flip-flop 410 could use an inverted clock (asshown by the filled diamond).

In this embodiment although the capture devices (i.e. flip-flops 407 and410) receive the same signal (i.e. on their D input terminals), only onecapture device can capture that signal (i.e. provide the signal on its Qoutput terminal) during any phase. In other embodiments, capture devicesin multiple destinations can latch the same signal during at least onephase. The latched signal can be provided to any component in the CLB.For example, in FIG. 4A, the latched signals from flip-flops 407 and 410can be provided to LUTs 408 and 411, respectively. Other latched signalsmay control user flip-flops (see, for example, the two flip-flops shownin FIG. 6) for clock enables and resets, as well as carry logic (see,for example, the multiplexers associated with the CIN and COUT values)or write enable circuitry for memory. Note that if a particulardestination does not use time multiplexing, then the appropriate capturedevice can be set to an “always PASS”, thereby allowing that destinationto receive signals on any phase.

Of importance, the number of multiplexed sources, the size of theselection device (e.g. multiplexer 404), the type of capture device(e.g. flip-flops 407 and 410), and the TM signal generation (e.g.providing TM signal 401) can vary from one embodiment to another. Forexample, FIG. 4B illustrates another embodiment of the invention inwhich at least one source in a CLB and at least one source outside theCLB can share sections of the interconnect to provide signals tomultiple destinations. In this embodiment, in addition to sources 403within CLB 402, another source 412, which is external to CLB 402, canprovide its output signal to selection device 404. Thus, TM signal 401could include multiple signals to control selection device 404 (e.g. a3:1 multiplexer) and capture devices 407 and 410. Of course, TM signal401 would need to indicate three phases, which can be accomplished bymaking it a multiple-bit bus.

Note that the destinations can be located in different CLBs or evenwithin the same CLB. For example, FIG. 4C illustrates yet anotherembodiment of the invention in which multiple sources can share sectionsof the interconnect to provide signals to the same CLB. Specifically,sources 403A, 403B, and 412 share portions of interconnect 405 toprovide their signals to a CLB 415. As described in reference to FIG. 5,the grouping of sources and destinations can improve the efficiency oftime multiplexing the interconnect.

In one embodiment of the invention, selection devices can be provided ina predetermined set of the CLBs. Fortunately, selection devices, such asmultiplexers, expend few silicon resources and therefore can beliberally placed in the CLBs without significant area impact. Therefore,in light of the minimal area impact of the selection devices and theirpotential to reduce signal congestion in high-density logic byfacilitating time multiplexing of the interconnect, a selection deviceis preferably provided in each CLB of the FPGA.

This time multiplexing technique, which is implemented in theinterconnect, has distinct functionality and structural featurescompared to the techniques described in reference to FIGS. 2 and 3.Specifically, the time multiplexed interconnect does not need additionalconfiguration memory arrays or bit sets to increase functionality.Instead, the time multiplexed interconnect can use a single (i.e.static) configuration memory in a time dependent manner to achievedifferent functionality at different points in time.

In general, a technique for time multiplexing the interconnect of anFPGA includes reviewing a design netlist to identify nets that can bemerged. Note that a netlist describes all structural features of adesign, i.e. like a schematic, but in code form. Then, the identifiednets can be merged to form the shared interconnect. At this point, thenew, smaller netlist can be placed and routed with the appropriateconstraints on the sources and destinations.

FIG. 5A illustrates a flow chart of one embodiment to time multiplex theinterconnect of an FPGA. In step 510, the design netlist can be analyzedfor low-speed (or high latency) signals. In step 511, the netsassociated with those low-speed (or high latency) signals can becollected into shared interconnect groups. In step 512, the netlist canbe modified. Specifically, for each selection device and associatedshared interconnect, a net can be built with all destinations in thegroup. Additionally, all sources could be connected to the selectiondevice.

In optional step 513, the sources could be constrained to be in the sameCLB. As indicated previously, the sources could be in separate CLBs.However, certain optimizations can be realized by placement of thesources in the same CLB. For example, less additional wire would beneeded to route the signals together. Moreover, the selection device(e.g. the multiplexer) could be placed within the CLB rather than in theinterconnect, thereby providing more predictable timing from the sourcesto the multiplexer and thus making it easier to avoid contention.Finally, the phase of the TM clock, which puts the signal onto theshared interconnect, can be more easily controlled inside the CLB.

In step 514, the design can be placed. In step 515, the design can berouted. Note that standard routers can automatically minimize the use ofprogrammable resources. Therefore, even standard routers can furtherenhance the advantages provided by the multiplexed interconnect.Finally, in step 516, the proper phase of the TM clock can be selectedfor all signals in the shared interconnect group.

In one embodiment, the TM clock can be properly timed to ensure that thepropagation delays of the signals are matched to their intendeddestinations. In other words, the TM clock can be varied as needed sothat each signal is received at its destination at the appropriate time.In another embodiment, the maximum speed of the TM clock can be timedbased on the slowest signal in the interconnect group, i.e. theworst-case delay signal from the TM multiplexer to its destination.

In one embodiment, if time critical signals are not propagated on theshared interconnect, then the TM clock need not run faster than thesystem clock, thereby easing performance constraints on the FPGA. Inanother embodiment, if critical signals are propagated on the sharedinterconnect, then the TM clock can run faster than the system clock.Note that in such cases, the system clock typically already has a lowspeed requirement. Advantageously, the tradeoffs of time multiplexingcritical or non-critical signals on the shared interconnect can be madein the place and route software with standard timing constraints.

Note that fan-outs in a design typically slow down their respectivesignal paths. Therefore, for an existing fan-out in a design (which isprobably already reserved for non-critical signal propagation), addingtime multiplexing to the shared interconnect can be implemented withoutunduly slowing down the overall design.

In one embodiment shown in FIG. 5B, an initial placement and an optionalrouting can be performed in step 520 without time multiplexing beingconsidered. In this manner, nets that naturally exhibit locality fortime multiplexing can be identified in step 521. In other words, aninitial placement could indicate that two sources have associatedinterconnect in substantially the same area of the FPGA. In such a case,a shared net can be identified. Note that the timing of the outputsignals from those sources, e.g. their latency, can be considered. Inother words, for those signals that would arrive late anyway, suchsignals could be delayed by using a late phase of the TM clock withoutsignificant negative impact on design functionality. At this point,steps 511-516 can be performed as previously described in reference toFIG. 5A.

FIG. 6 illustrates a portion of a CLB provided in the Virtex™-E FPGA,which is sold by Xilinx, Inc. Two possible locations for the selectiondevice are shown. Specifically selection device 602 can receive the CLBoutput signals X and Y, whereas a selection device 601 can receive theCLB output signals Y and YQ. Note that other embodiments of theselection device could receive different CLB output signals. Althoughother multiplexers are provided in the CLB, the selection device(s) arecontrolled by the TM clock, not a system or user's clock. As indicatedpreviously, the TM clock also controls the capture devices in thedestinations. FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary capture devices 407 and 410,which can be respectively located on the G2 and F2 inputs of the LUTs inthe CLB. In this manner, the shared interconnect can be multiplexed formultiple sources sending signals to multiple destinations. Note that oneor more selection devices can be placed within one CLB.

The present invention is described above in reference to variousembodiments. Variations and modifications to those embodiments will beapparent to those skilled in the art. For example, in one embodiment,multiplexing can have any number of phases. Thus, a design could havemany multiplexed signals, wherein not all multiplexed signals need tohave the same number of different phases. In other words, somemultiplexed signals could have 2:1 phases, whereas some multiplexedsignals could have 5:1 phases. In another embodiment, the capturedevices and selection devices could have different locations from thoseshown herein. In yet another embodiment, capture devices or selectiondevices could be limited to a subset of the signals or a subset of thedevices. In another embodiment, initial placement and low-criticalityanalysis could be combined to choose which signals are to be combined.In yet another embodiment, various software algorithms or tools could beuse for placement and routing. For example, additional timing analysistools or logic generating tools could be included in the software flow.Moreover, restrictions could be placed on signals to prevent (or force)them to be time-multiplexed. In another embodiment, different ways couldbe used to indicate the data phase (e.g. using a global phase bus orreset signal for synchronization). In yet another embodiment, a phase IDor signal ID could be broadcast to all multiplexed devices or on theshared interconnect. In another embodiment, additional logic can beincluded to compare or compute the time-multiplexed clock phase at eachdestination. Therefore, the present invention is limited only by theappended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of time multiplexing signals oninterconnect in a programmable logic device, the method comprising:analyzing a netlist to be implemented by the programmable logic devicefor signals exhibiting certain characteristics; merging a set of netscarrying the signals into a shared interconnect portion; altering thenetlist based on the merging; placing a design represented by thealtered netlist; routing the design; and selecting phases of a timemultiplexed clock for the signals.
 2. A method of time multiplexingsignals on interconnect in a programmable logic device, the methodcomprising: performing an initial placement of a design to beimplemented by the programmable logic device; identifying nets thatexhibit locality based on the performing; merging the nets into a sharedinterconnect portion; altering the design based on the merging; placingthe altered design; routing the altered design; and selecting phases ofa time multiplexed clock for signals to be provided on the nets.
 3. Aconfigured programmable logic device comprising: a plurality ofconfigurable logic blocks, wherein a first set of configurable logicblocks includes multiple signal sources coupled to a selection device,and wherein a second set of configurable logic blocks includes multiplecapture devices and corresponding signal destinations; a programmableinterconnect coupled to the plurality of configurable logic blocksaccording to a design, wherein at least one portion of the programmableinterconnect couples the selection device and the multiple capturedevices; and a time multiplexing signal generator operatively coupled tothe selection device and the capture devices, wherein the timemultiplexing signal generator controls which of the multiple signalsources provides its signal to a corresponding signal destination. 4.The configured programmable logic device of claim 3, wherein themultiple signal sources are located in one configurable logic block. 5.The configured programmable logic device of claim 3, wherein themultiple signal sources are located in at least two configurable logicblocks.
 6. The configured programmable logic device of claim 3, whereinthe multiple capture devices and corresponding signal destinations arelocated in one configurable logic block.
 7. The configured programmablelogic device of claim 3, wherein the multiple capture devices andcorresponding signal destinations are located in at least twoconfigurable logic blocks.
 8. The configured programmable logic deviceof claim 3, wherein the multiple signal sources generate non-criticalsignals.
 9. The configured programmable logic device of claim 3, whereinthe multiple signal sources generate critical signals.
 10. Theconfigured programmable logic device of claim 3, wherein the selectiondevice includes a multiplexer.
 11. The configured programmable logicdevice of claim 3, at least one capture device includes a flip-flop. 12.The configured programmable logic device of claim 3, at least onecapture device includes a latch.
 13. The configured programmable logicdevice of claim 3, at least one signal destination includes a look-uptable.
 14. The configured programmable logic device of claim 3, the timemultiplexing signal generator includes a counter.